Monetizing the Connected Car: Part 1

November 30, 2020in Thought Leadership

by Greg Ross, Connected Vehicles Practice Lead, motormindz

Monetizing the Connected Car, Part 1

The Search for Data Monetization Begins at Home

Ever since McKinsey and Company published its study, titled “Monetizing Car Data” in September of 2016, automotive OEM’s have been working to develop monetization opportunities from connected cars. Back then, McKinsey estimated that car-generated data could represent a new market worth between $450 and $750 Billion by 2030. Studies like this one helped convince most OEM’s to install both hardware and software for built-in connectivity in nearly all new vehicles, and most have then gone in search of new revenues to help offset the investment. For many, the first place to look has been externally, targeting insurance companies, fleet managers, fuel merchants, tolling providers, and consumers of parking and traffic data. Many of these initiatives are growing steadily, and beginning to produce revenues as the volume of connected cars grows. But while the ecosystem of third party data consumers grows, OEM’s should look closer to home for a return on their connected car investments. For a typical high-volume OEM, there are millions of dollars of opportunity in using connected cars for internal cost savings, quality improvements, and efficiencies.

OEM’s are Large Fleet Operators

A typical OEM is also the owner and operator of large fleets of vehicles. At any one time, there are thousands of vehicles moving through the logistics chain from factories or port facilities through rail lines and marshaling yards and ultimately to dealership inventories. With all of those vehicles connected, there are huge opportunities for operational improvements.  Vehicles can be tracked for more precise planning of deliveries, as illustrated in a recent announcement by GM Fleet and a startup called Motorq. Fleets gain efficiency by reducing the time waiting for new vehicles to come on line. The OEM that provides these efficiencies can see “monetization” by becoming a more preferred vehicle provider. Dealers can similarly benefit from more precise tracking of incoming deliveries. An OEM’s finance arm can largely eliminate physical “floor plan” audits of dealer inventories by remotely validating that a vehicle is located where it should be. Theft of vehicles in the logistics chain or in dealer inventories can be easily tracked or even eliminated through remote vehicle disablement. Diagnostics of vehicles in inventory can be pulled remotely, and addressed as needed. As OEM’s continue to expand their ability to deliver software Over-The-Air, new software “fixes” can be delivered remotely to vehicles while they are still in the logistics chain and before they reach customers.

OEM’s also control large numbers of vehicles used in product development, by employees in company vehicle programs, and by retail customers in service loaner fleets. Connected car capabilities can bring fleet management efficiencies to all three use cases and deliver savings to the OEM’s bottom line. Sources of value include optimization of the number of vehicles deployed for each use case, management of vehicle diagnostics, mileage and maintenance, and coaching and improvements in driver behavior. The scale of the auto business can make savings add up quickly. If enhanced efficiency can eliminate the need for one vehicle in each dealer’s loaner fleet, for example, this could mean a reduction of hundreds of vehicles across the fleet – and savings in the tens of millions.

Connected Cars can be Superior Sources of Data

Connected cars can also provide direct information on how vehicles are performing and how they are being used in the field. This data can be superior to traditional sources like customer surveys, social media posts, or warranty claims. Better data means faster responses and a superior understanding of the customer.  In the area of product quality, connected cars can deliver real-time diagnostic codes for analysis by the OEM long before trends are noticed from warranty repair data.  This connection creates the potential for proactive diagnostics, or “prognostics,” where Artificial Intelligence is applied to large data sets to identify and predict component failures before they happen. Customers benefit by having “predictive maintenance” done before a failure causes a breakdown. OEM’s benefit from greater customer satisfaction and from insights that can be used to eliminate future failures and warranty costs. And as more OEM’s develop capabilities to deliver Over-the-Air software updates, more can deliver software repairs without requiring a service visit. Through these technologies, customers will increasingly come to expect that their vehicles will never let them down, thanks to tight communication and coordination with the manufacturer and the dealer.

Connected cars can also collect data on how vehicles are actually used, rather than relying exclusively on customer surveys or sample observations. For example, it is possible to see how often seat belts are actually being used. This could be used for worried parents to coach new teenage drivers, or it could be used by fleets to coach its drivers and reduce their risk of injury on the job. Product planners can see how often ABS braking, Traction Control, Lane Departure, Blind Spot Detection, Automatic Braking, or other systems are deployed, and under what conditions. Engineers can use this information to fine-tune these features and improve their performance. And it is also possible for an OEM to take these unique insights to create new services. Last week, GM announced that it would apply its unique data and insights to create better, lower-cost car insurance. Planners can also look at how often various settings and features in the HVAC or Infotainment systems are being used. This information can be used to optimize the performance of these systems and design vehicles to meet customer needs and real-world usage. The “monetization” in this case comes from having better insights into customer usage and needs, and translating that into better vehicles and greater customer satisfaction and loyalty.

Internal Uses Builds Skills Needed for External Monetization

In order to turn external parties into paying data customers, OEM’s will need to build an infrastructure to securely collect and store data, and then make it available in an easily consumable form. Third-party data customers will also have expectations for system reliability and data quality. Fortunately, the systems that OEM’s develop to serve their internal efforts build much of the same infrastructure needed to serve external customers at scale. So an OEM’s internal savings effort can provide both immediate cost savings and efficiencies and build a platform and skills needed for future growth.

The global OEM’s are enormous, complex enterprises. Each one owns, operates, or indirectly manages vehicles worth hundreds of millions of dollars. And each one spends hundreds of millions to billions on product development and warranty expenses. The path toward “monetization” of connected car investments runs through a robust program of internal benefits and uses.

motormindz’ Connected Vehicles Practice provides unique, proprietary leverage to help you successfully monetize your connected data & technologies at scale. Our subject matter experts have directly led large operational teams at the major OEs to widespread success in doing exactly this. If you’re interested in harnessing the power of Connected to grow and scale your business, reach out to us, or join one of our programs. Connect quickly, as space continues to be limited.

“Right to Repair” and the Connected Car

November 5, 2020 in Thought Leadership

by Greg Ross, Connected Vehicles Practice Lead, motormindz

Voters showed strong support for Question 1, indicating high levels of interest in access to telematics data and open data standards.

Among all of the important decisions made on November 3, there was one in Massachusetts that may significantly affect auto dealers, manufacturers, independent repair shops and auto owners.  Question 1 on this year’s Massachusetts ballot expands existing “Right to Repair” laws in the Commonwealth to require auto OEM’s to make data from telematics systems available to independent repair shops.  The law, which appears to have been approved by a wide margin, will require all auto OEM’s to place telematics data on an independently-operated data platform.  The data on the platform will then be available, upon customer consent, to any independent repair shop.  The law requires this data platform to be in place in Massachusetts beginning with the 2022 model year.

New Business for Platform Providers

The first opportunity will be for one or more  platform providers to build the “independent” platform that the law requires.  There will be significant work to be done to take data in from all telematics-equipped OEM’s and prepare it for distribution to hundreds of repair shops and potentially other end-users.  This will not be a simple task, since most OEM’s are just at the beginning of their telematics implementations.  There is no common data standard.  Different OEM telematics systems have access to different kinds of data, with different reporting frequencies, and widely different reliability.  The platform will also have to be highly secure, in order to honor customer expectations for privacy and control over which parties should have access to data.  And finally, the platform will need to enable billing, as there will presumably be a charge to cover the cost of data collection and processing.

New Opportunities for Service Providers

Question 1 was strongly supported by independent auto repair shops and auto parts and repair chain operators in Massachusetts.  Their coalition successfully framed the question as one of “closing a loophole” in the current Right to Repair laws.  They said that repair shops need data from telematics systems in order to repair vehicles.  As their opponents — led by auto manufacturers — pointed out, this is misleading.  Independent repair shops can already get the data they need to perform diagnostic and repair services.  Once a vehicle is in their shop, independents already have an ability to use the same diagnostic tools available to franchised dealers.  What the independents really hope to gain however, is a direct connection to the customer.  My own Chevy Colorado can serve as an example.  Today, when the diagnostic systems on my truck indicate the need for an oil change, Chevrolet is authorized to use the built-in telematics system to notify my Chevrolet dealer.  Whenever my oil life gets down to about 20%, I get a call and a text from my dealer to schedule an appointment.  Question 1 will make it possible for customers like me to give the quick lube shop down the street the same connection.  The tire shop could be notified when tire pressures are low.  A fuel provider could be notified when a fill-up is needed.  CarFax may ask for permission to keep track of diagnostic, maintenance and mileage activity to help owners prove the value their used vehicles down the road.  And so on.

Implications for Dealers

The Independent shops in Massachusetts clearly hope to use this new initiative to gain business from franchised dealers (or prevent current business from being lost to Dealers).  In order to maintain and grow the dealers’ share of non-warranty repair and maintenance business, dealers will have to make excellent use of the telematics systems installed by their manufacturers.  Dealers start with a key advantage, which is the opportunity to start a connected service relationship with the customer from the moment the new or used vehicle is delivered.  Dealers must be sure to activate systems and secure customer consent to share service and maintenance data with the dealer.  Dealers then have to do a great job of managing data notifications to quickly schedule customers for any needed service work.  Dealers will have a very brief head start to fine tune their use of connected car service notifications, and they will need to take full advantage.

Questions Yet to be Answered

Now that Question appears to have passed, this is only be the beginning.  Given that state of readiness of most OEM’s, a model year 2022 deadline will be very difficult to hit.  The Commonwealth will still need to answer many questions about the kinds of data that must be provided and the types of consent that must be obtained.  A platform provider will need to be sourced, and there will be many questions about how a provider should be selected, who should pay to create the platform, and how its operating costs should be covered.  There will also be questions about who qualifies as a “repair shop” and represents a legitimate user of the telematics data stored on the independent platform.  Question 1 also says that the platform should not only collect data from telematics systems, but also deliver “commands” to connected vehicles to enable diagnosis and repair.  It is unclear whether this is intended to mean that independent repair shops should be able to deliver Over-the-air, or OTA software “patches,” or “updates.”  Though Tesla has demonstrated this OTA capability extensively, most  OEM’s will not be ready to support widespread OTA delivery of software updates by model year 2022.

As with so many other issues on the ballot this year, the most interesting thing will be to see what happens now that the election is over.